A summery of the 3 Republican/TeaParty debates....and why teabaggers are coldhearted....
Debate #1...Ron Paul was asked a hypothetical question about a dying man without health insurance...the teabaggers in the audience cheered for the dying man who had no chance at life...Conclusion: the teabaggers believe health insurance is a privilege not a right and if one decides not to purchase insurance and then subsequently gets a terminal illness well that's his fuckin stupidity, so die, just die....no turning back, too bad sucker you had your chance....
Debate #2....Rick Perry was asked some kinda question about the over 200 executions under his watch in Texas and the teabaggers cheered wildly for the deaths by legal injection...Conclusion: teabaggers believe in the Biblical an eye for an eye. If a person was found guilty by his peers and then 20 yrs later evidence was brought forward to cast reasonable doubt on the man's guilt, well fuck it. Too late Mister...20 yrs previous you were found guilty so that's what we're going by...die possible innocent man, die... because facts don't matter when so much time has passed... the state would look like an incompetent fool if they had to admit holding the wrong man on death row for half his life... so we'll just put this whole debacle behind us and execute him....there ya have it, an eye for an eye.
Debate #3.....A gay soldier asked this question to the GOP candidates by video from Iraq..."under one of your presidencies do you intend to circumvent the progress that's been made for gay and lesbian soldiers in the military?" Quite unbelievably the teabaggers in the audience booed the soldier who was in a war zone fighting "for their freedoms" which is the Republican mantra since the beginning of time...so quite unbelievably NO GOOPER stood up for the soldier!.... Rick Santorum, when given the chance to answer the soldier, said..."sexual activity has absolutely no place in the
military," and said the repeal of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy,
which took effect this week, was injecting "social policy into the
military." and so he would reverse the decision to repeal it....SEX and the act of sex?? Is this all repubs think about while envisioning a gay or lesbian in the military? Do they envision straight men and women in sex acts as soldiers?? Conclusion: Conservative/teabaggers are repulsed by gays. Homosexuality is an abomination according to God, so enlist to defend our country but do not tell us you are gay cuz then we'll have the vision of your sexual activity forever in our minds and we won't be able to carry out the mission of defending our nation.....(((Shudder)))
Conclusion by me: Teabaggers are subhuman
Dervish Sanders Seeks The Assistance of Hasan The Carpet Merchant
-
Dervish Sanders: Bing Copilot AI, what was the deal with that last story
you told me? I regret to say it was very boring. I was waiting for
something exc...
13 hours ago
7 comments:
Repblicans only think about homosexuals because they either know or fear they are one. So they try to wipe homosexuality from the face of the earth so no one else will recognize them for what they truly are. Hypocrisy at its best.
I think you are right about that. It must be very difficult for a conservative who is gay, and alot of them are. They hate themselves, therefore hate all gays. It's that looming BIG SIN thing ya know...
Maybe. I just think Republicans hate everyone, period - unless, of course, they are a WASP.
If only these republicans would practice what they preached and not had sex. In a few generations there would be no more f them.
On the other hand, maybe the infrequency of sex is what makes them such assholes. God I feel sorry for their women who will never experience an orgasm.
I agree with Leslie on this: these Repubs hate EVERYBODY who is not EXACTLY like them...in thought, word but not deed. (If anybody else acted the way THEY do, well.....)
Talk about projecting!
One time, OK. Let it slide. It is an aberation and caught everyone by surprise..
Two times! It is time to call them out. Not appropriate behavior.
Three times and still no response?!? I consider it acceptance. You agree with them.
The problem is that this type behavior is indicative of the mind set of the ultra-conservative wing of the republicans. Ultra-conservatives are not known for their benevolent behavior and general respect for those that do not believe the same as they do, be it religion or politics. They would rather show up with guns.
Couple that with the reluctance of the republican candidates to call out the ultra-conservatives on their unacceptable behavior, and you end up with a bunch of idiots who have no business thinking that they have the ability to lead this country.
The republicans are clearly being controlled by what would be called extremists in any other country.
Post a Comment