Monday, November 30, 2009

Cult of Conservative Christian GOPers

By Stephen Webster, Raw Story. ALTERNET: Posted November 30, 2009.

The African nation of Uganda is weighing a bill that would impose the death penalty on HIV positive men who have committed what it calls "aggravated homosexuality."

As if that were not shocking enough, a U.S. author is claiming that a secretive group of American politicians appear to be a driving force in seeing the proposal become law.

The Anti-Homosexuality Bill 2009, heavily supported by Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni, was first read in October, triggering a wave of condemnation. According to the gay blog Queerty, Joann Lockard, public affairs officer at the Kampala, Uganda embassy, said the law would "constitute a significant step backwards for the protection of human rights in Uganda."

She added: "We urge states to take all necessary measures to ensure that sexual orientation or gender identity may under no circumstances be the basis for criminal penalties, in particular executions, arrests, or detention."

While that condemnation by a U.S. official would seem reflexive, others in U.S. political circles are providing financial and political support for the bill's sponsors, according to author Jeff Sharlet.

Sharlet's book "The Family" is an investigative look at a secretive group of fundamentalist Christian lawmakers in Washington, D.C. In a recent interview with NPR's Terry Gross, he broke the news that The Family's influence in Uganda is rife.

"[The] legislator that introduced the bill, a guy named David Bahati, is a member of The Family," he said. "He appears to be a core member of The Family. He works, he organizes their Ugandan National Prayer Breakfast and oversees a African sort of student leadership program designed to create future leaders for Africa, into which The Family has poured millions of dollars working through a very convoluted chain of linkages passing the money over to Uganda."

And how did Sharlet discover the connection? "You follow [the] money," he said. You look at their archives. You do interviews where you can. It's not so invisible anymore. So that's how working with some research colleagues we discovered that David Bahati, the man behind this legislation, is really deeply, deeply involved in The Family's work in Uganda, that the ethics minister of Uganda, Museveni's kind of right-hand man, a guy named Nsaba Buturo, is also helping to organize The Family's National Prayer Breakfast. And here's a guy who has been the main force for this Anti-Homosexuality Act in Uganda's executive office and has been very vocal about what he's doing, in a rather extreme and hateful way. But these guys are not so much under the influence of The Family. They are, in Uganda, The Family."

Under current Ugandan law, homosexuality is a crime punishable by life in prison. The proposed law would not just condemn HIV positive gay men and "repeat offenders" to death, it would also jail for three years anyone who knows a gay man but refuses to report them to authorities. Further, anyone who defends in public the rights of gays and lesbians would be subjected to a seven year prison term.

In his NPR interview, Sharlet said the bill would "very likely" pass and become Ugandan law. He added that the nation's president, whom he called a "dictator," has long been in The Family's fold.

"The Family identified [Museveni] back in 1986 as a key man for Africa," he said. "They wanted to steer him away from neutrality or leftist sympathies and bring him into conservative American alliances, and they were able to do so. They've since promoted Uganda as this bright spot - as I say, as this bright spot for African democracy, despite the fact that under their tutelage, Museveni has slowly shifted away from any even veneer of democracy: imprisoning journalists, tampering with elections, supporting - strongly supporting this Anti-Homosexuality Act of 2009."

Canada and the U.K. have been leading the international charge against the proposed law, with both prime ministers Gordon Brown and Stephen Harper condemning it.

"Addressing the Commonwealth People’s Forum, Stephen Lewis, the former UN envoy on Aids in Africa, said that the Bill made a mockery of Commonwealth principles," the Times Online reported. "Nothing is as stark, punitive and redolent of hate as the Bill in Uganda," Lewis said.

"We needn't tell you: The implications are dire," opined Queerty. "It's not abnormal for foreign heads of state, like Museveni, to have ties to American politicos. But he's deeply routed in a secretive organization that promotes hatred under the guise of loving Jesus. And the very people — America's elected officials who believe in human rights — we would expect to pressure Uganda's lawmakers not to make such a bill law are turning out to be its biggest supporters."


'hatred under the guise of loving Jesus'. Yes it's true, conservative religious fanatics, THE FAMILY, are supporting a law to murder innocents. People unlike themselves are not worthy to live on this earth? I said it before and it caused a firestorm, but I will say it again..... these right-wing religious fanatics are not walking in Jesus' footsteps, but they are wrapped in the arms of Satan.....

Tell President Obama NO!!




You've probably heard that President Obama is about to decide whether to send a lot more troops to Afghanistan.1

And since you're an activist, you also know that there are a ton of reasons this would be a mistake: Hundreds more troops will be killed along with countless civilians. And we could get stuck in an Iraq-style quagmire for decades, while terrorism experts say this isn't even a good way to fight Al Qaeda.

Well, here's one more reason: The war will bankrupt our economy and divert funds we urgently need for health care, education and jobs.

Afghanistan is just about the most remote, difficult-to-access part of the world there is. Sending a gallon of gas there costs $400; keeping a soldier armed, fed and cared for costs almost $1 million a year!2

Tell President Obama -- with the economy in shambles, we just can't afford any more war. It's time to stop sending troops, and create a clear timetable to bring everyone home from Afghanistan.

http://act.truemajorityaction.org/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=44

We have nearly 70,000 troops already in Afghanistan,3 yet over the last few months, things have consistently gone from bad to worse despite our engagement. So it's no surprise that most Americans are now opposed to the war.4

Despite Afghanistan's problems and lack of public support, some people inside the beltway want to send a huge number of additional troops into harms way -- with no timeline for their return and no clear mission to gauge progress by.5

It's the same mistake that got us trapped in Iraq, and which President Obama has promised to avoid with a new foreign policy.

Don't let us go down the same path again - tell Obama not to send more troops.


Is President Obama really going to tell us tomorrow thousands of our troops are going to Afghanistan?? I'm sorry but I can not support the president on this decision, no matter how long and hard it was for him. I don't see an end to these quagmires. I'm so thankful I have no family or friends fighting in these wars or I don't know how I would handle this horrible news! Cindy Sheehan is my hero, here is some of the latest news about her....

In August, 2009, Sheehan protested at Martha's Vineyard during President Barack Obama's stay there. According to ABC News: "Sheehan invoked Sen. Ted Kennedy's passing as part of her message, noting that he was firmly anti-war and how he said his proudest vote as a senator was his 2002 vote against the Iraq war."[84]

On October 5 Sheehan was arrested with sixty others at the White House protesting President Obama's continuation of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. She told CNN: "I think the mood of the country and the mood of our movement is getting a little bit more desperate, and (that) this will be the time to be able to translate our tireless activism and work for peace."[85]

Please sign the petition!

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

INSANE Americans heart Sarah......



This is one of the most bizarre videos of American insanity I have ever seen! It's actually scary we have people like these living in our neighborhoods, our kids are playing with their kids, they are working side by side with us!! Good Lord, this is what we have to listen to for the next 3 years?? I say 3 years because after that Palin will be long forgotten, in fact it's her own rethug party that will destroy her, thank God!!

One idiot man said... "I think you'll see crowds like this wherever she goes"
Yes sir, idiots JUST LIKE YOU....

I hope you listen to this whole video, it's amazing!!

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

US says no to landmine ban

Help us understand this RZ!

U.S. won't join landmine ban, administration decides

From Charley Keyes, CNN Senior Producer
November 24, 2009 6:05 p.m. EST


Washington (CNN) -- The United States won't join its NATO allies and many other countries in formally banning landmines, State Department spokesman Ian Kelly said during his midday briefing Tuesday.

"This administration undertook a policy review and we decided our landmine policy remains in effect," Kelly said in response to a question. "We made our policy review and we determined that we would not be able to meet our national defense needs nor our security commitments to our friends and allies if we sign this convention."

Opponents of the U.S. landmine policy said they were surprised.

"It is a disturbing development," said Steve Goose of Human Rights Watch. "The administration never said a policy review was under way."

Goose said the decision to leave the policy in place is at odds with the administration's professed commitments to international agreements and humanitarian issues.

"The international treaty against landmines has made a a huge difference and it is a very strong deterrent," Goose said. "It has to have been a very fast and cursory review."

The United States will attend an international conference on landmines next week in Cartagena, Colombia, sending an inter-agency delegation from the State and Defense departments as observers.

Kelly said the United States continues to work with governments as well as nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) to help remove landmines.

"The U.S. is proud to be the world's single largest supporter of humanitarian mine action," Kelly said. "Since 1993 the U.S. has provided more than $1.5 billion worldwide dedicated to building new partnerships with more than 50 post-conflict countries and supporting efforts by dozens of NGOs to promote stability and set the stage for recovery and development through mine clearance and conventional-weapons destruction programs."

The United States is the only member of NATO that will not sign the landmine treaty, Goose said. Russia and China also have not joined the 156 nations that have endorsed the ban, he said.


I am feeling increasingly uneasy about this administration and President Obama. Now don't get me wrong, I don't plan on badmouthing him, or jumping ship. I just want to see a more forceful president when it comes to progressive issues. He has disapointed me with the stance on Afghanistan, and his laid back style with the HC reform is so annoying. I am growing impatient and I don't want to. I'm always the optimist remember??

On my bloglist you will see Annette has a video up , there is an event coming up in January, a rally in Washington that we hope will put any 'ole teabagging groupie to shame! This is a rally to support the president and his agenda. We need a massive amout of people there so check out the video and write down the date! We dems have to show the rightwing nutjobs what a real rally looks like, plus I need to get my half empty glass half full again!! I need this bad!

Monday, November 23, 2009

A divided left-wing


Why is it republicans stood behind a joke of a president like Bush, but when the majority of the country elects a democrat, a very popular democrat, the left can't make up its mind what it stands for? How can we sit by and let 3 or 4 obstructionist dems(yes I said obstructionist dems, not rethugs, we all know rethugs are irrelevant) take down the president and this very important reform that will shape his presidency!

Harry Reid I have one word and one word only... RECONCILIATION!!!!! Do Not take us back to 1994!

Monday Funny!

We could use a good laugh, besides this reminds me of the repubs from the deep south, in a red state of course. You choose which state! :-)))

I got this today in my inbox......


Dearest Redneck Son,

I'm writing this slow because I know you can't read fast. We don't live where we did when you left home. Your dad read in the newspaper that most accidents happen within 20 miles of your home, so we moved. I won't be able to send you the address because the last family that lived here took the house numbers when they moved so they wouldn't have to change their address.

This place is really nice. It even has a washing machine. I'm not sure about it. I put a load of clothes in and pulled the chain. We haven't seen them since.

The weather isn't bad here. It only rained twice last week; the first time for three days and the second time for four days.

About that coat you wanted me to send; your Uncle Billy Bob said it wouldbe too heavy to send in the mail with the buttons on, so we cut them off and put them in the pockets.

Bubba locked his keys in the car yesterday. We were really worried because it took him two hours to get me and your father out.

Your sister had a baby this morning, but I haven't found out what it is yet so I don't know if you are an aunt or uncle.

Uncle Bobby Ray fell into a whiskey vat last week. Some men tried to pull him out but he fought them off and drowned. We had him cremated, he burned for three days.

Three of your friends went off a bridge in a pickup truck. Butch was driving. He rolled down the window and swam to safety. Your other two friends were in the back. They drowned because they couldn't get the tailgate down!

There isn't much more news at this time. Nothing much out of the normal has happened.

Your Favorite Aunt,

Mom

Saturday, November 21, 2009

RETHUGS, THE PARTY OF NO! Did you expect anything more??

Well, the vote is in, Democrats vote to proceed with debate. Rethugs vote NO. Fuckers are nothing but obstructionist pigs. They deserve nothing from the citizens of this country. They are irrelevent!! If you think for one minute these rethugs are voting NO because they care about you, or they care about deficit numbers, you are mistaken. They care only about destroying President Obama!! FUCK YOU REPUBLICAN PARTY OF NO!!!

Friday, November 20, 2009

The Ed Show talks, yes it's HC and rethug obstruction



This clip of the Ed Show is a long one I'm sorry. but at 3:20 in you will see Debbie Stabenow talking about the HC bill. At 7:30 in they talk about this bill helping small business which rethugs are AGAINST. Yea you heard me, AGAINST. Republicans are liars, they are not interested in helping small business and Main St. Do yourself a favor, listen to this video, it's a good one.

Tomorrow night is the vote, picture this, I'll be in my flannels, I'll have my bowl of popcorn and a large Pepsi, I believe word on the street is all 60 will vote yes to proceed!

Presidential material, you betcha!!



Oh yea baby, you got yourselves a smart one this time.....lol

Thursday, November 19, 2009

HC in a nutshell

For those who don't have time to read the 2,074 pages of the HCB, here's a rundown. Courtesy of Think Progress:

The Details Of The New Merged Senate Bill

pelosi_reid_0705Moments ago, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) released the merged Senate health care bill. According to preliminary CBO analysis, the Senate bill costs $849 billion over 10 years and reduces the deficit by $127 billion over 10 years. The legislation could further reduce the deficit by up to $650 billion cut over the following decade, the budget office says.

The bill –which includes a national public health insurance plan with the option for states to pass a law and opt-out — reduces the uninsured by 31 million Americans and covers 98% of Americans by 2019.

The bill increases the threshold for the so-called Cadillac tax, raises the payroll tax by 0.5% on individuals who earn more than $200,000 and families earning more than $250,000 a year, and cuts waste from Medicare. The payroll tax increase would only apply to employees (not employers) and generate $54 billion.

Did you get that rethugs? It WILL NOT increase taxes on small business and kill jobs like you love to wish it did!

The bill maintains the Senate Finance Committee’s immigration language and preserves much of the more moderate Capps-abortion compromise. Federal dollars can only be used to pay for abortions when the pregnancy threatens the life of the mother or results from rape or incest; private premiums must be used to pay for any other type of abortion, including those for health reasons. Each plan in Exchange will decide whether to cover additional abortion services and at least one plan in each market must offer abortion services and one plan must not. In the public option, the Secretary can cover abortion only if the procedure is financed with private funds.

Since the Exchanges don’t open open until 2014, the bill offers immediate insurance reforms for Americans purchasing coverage in the individual market. Insurers will no longer be allowed to rescind coverage or impose life-time or annual limits and will be required to meet a medical-loss ratio of 85 percent. Americans who are denied coverage because of a pre-existing condition would participate in a national high-risk pool program until the Exchanges are established. Young Americans can stay on their parents’ policies until they turn 26. Small businesses will receive a tax credit.

Tom says...



I've always said I trust Tom Harkin, and I still do! I wish my fellow dems wouldn't be so pessimistic and show some support for our congressmen and president......

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

BREAKING NEWS!

Reid says caucus went well, all had smiles on their faces! Bill will be online tonight. Said a public option is included. "Finish line is in sight"! CBO has validated the bill will actually reduce deficit by 127B over 10 years, and this bill is paid for. Right now on MSNBC, gotta go listen!

a thought......

While watching the evening news my local station had a segment about the upcoming terrorist trial in NY. He said the republicans are AFRAID (there's alot of that going around lately) the trial being in NY, instead of secretly hidden away in military tribunals, will give the terrorists a platform to spew their hate. I thought to myself, Hmmmmmm, isn't that what we give the republicans every day?? A PLATFORM TO SPEW THEIR HATE!! HYPOCRITES!!!

If they were honest they would tell us their only fear is for a dem president to show he is tough on terror. They are petrified for a dem president to do what they couldn't.....fuckers

Frank Schaeffer talks some serious shit!



If you missed Rachel last night then please take the time to look and listen to this video. It's long and I tried to crop it but don't know how! All Rachels shows are excellent but this segment on the wingnuts latest nuttery is a must see. They are circulating yet another Bible verse, A Prayer for Obama, PSALMS 109:8&9. For you neocons who refuse to see the evil of your ways please look at this part of the video then try to explain it away, I'd really love your comments. After that is Frank Schaeffer, Frank is an X wingnut so he knows what he is talking about, he is asking all conservatives to denounce the religious fanatics, this is not fun and games anymore, this is scary. The religious fanatics are not led by God when they put out their vile and evil words, this is an entity like nothing we have seen in this country. Conservatives, if you only listen to rightwing media then you are not getting the full picture. Let me know what you think about this latest wingnuttery!

Monday, November 16, 2009

Sarah is soooo boring...

Wasn't today Oprahs interview with Sarah Palin?? I forgot, damn...

Why are we giving this empty-headed moron air time anyway?? Why has MSM gone bonkers reporting about this hideous book?? The majority of sane America despises her. I wish she would fade away into the woodwork, or how about another far away country, somewhere, far far away....

I'm bored with the story, I sure hope Keith doesn't talk about her tonight, he probably will. In fact he'll probably do a 15 minute rant.

I'd much rather hear about Lizard Cheney and her comment on Fox Sunday morning. She said "Cheney 2012". I don't know if she meant herself or her evil twin, daddy. Did anybody see the show or read anything about it? Can you imagine, Dick the M F 'er actually thinking he could be president?? Maybe this could get the ball rolling with Obamas administration and put the fucker behind bars. Would he, could he, campaign in prison...??

Time for Countdown!

Get the story right or don't say anything!

I have seen a few conservative blogs claiming President Obama wants to "slow down" the investigation of the Fort Hood murders. They are of course trying to insinuate something sinister, like Hasan is a Muslim.... therefore Obama being Muslim......there HAS to be a connection.....
They have accused the President of wanting to go real slow so the public will eventually forget about it, it'll be taken off the front pages..... and well you can just imagine what they are assuming!

I actually got this from Foxnews.com. The header said...OBAMA URGES CONGRESS TO DELAY FORT HOOD INVESTIGATION:
President Obama on Saturday urged Congress to hold off on any investigation of the Fort Hood rampage until federal law enforcement and military authorities have completed their probes into the shootings at the Texas Army post, which left 13 people dead.

On an eight-day Asia trip, Obama turned his attention home and pleaded for lawmakers to "resist the temptation to turn this tragic event into the political theater." He said those who died on the nation's largest Army post deserve justice, not political stagecraft.

"The stakes are far too high," Obama said in a video and Internet address released by the White House while the president was flying from Tokyo to Singapore, where Pacific Rim countries were meeting.


Isn't it so typical of these moron, conservative, Obama hating bloggers to twist and turn upside down a story that says NOT ONE THING that they are claiming!

President Obama said in his weekly address to the nation...

"There is an ongoing investigation into this terrible tragedy. That investigation will look at the motives of the alleged gunman, including his views and contacts. As I said in Fort Hood, I am confident that justice will be done, and I will insist that the full story be told. That is paramount, and I won’t compromise that investigation today by discussing the details of this case. But given the potential warning signs that may have been known prior these shootings, we must uncover what steps – if any – could have been taken to avert this tragedy.

On the Thursday evening that this tragedy took place, I met in the Oval Office with Secretary of Defense Gates, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff – Admiral Mullen, and FBI Director Mueller to review the immediate steps that were necessary to support the families and secure Fort Hood. The next morning, I met with the leadership of our military and the intelligence community, and ordered them to undertake a full review of the sequence of events that led up to the shootings.

The purpose of this review is clear: We must compile every piece of information that was known about the gunman, and we must learn what was done with that information. Once we have those facts, we must act upon them. If there was a failure to take appropriate action before the shootings, there must be accountability. Beyond that – and most importantly – we must quickly and thoroughly evaluate and address any flaws in the system, so that we can prevent a similar breach from happening again. Our government must be able to act swiftly and surely when it has threatening information. And our troops must have the security that they deserve.

I know there will also be inquiries by Congress, and there should. But all of us should resist the temptation to turn this tragic event into the political theater that sometimes dominates the discussion here in Washington. The stakes are far too high." (END)


There you have it, the President will NOT drag this out and delay. What he is saying to Congressmen, obstructionist neocons, is stay the hell out of it if you are planning on turning this story into something it is not just for political grandstanding!

Sunday, November 15, 2009

interesting read on rethuggery stupidity


Check out this post by Spencer Ackermann-firedoglake. He quotes Sarah Palin's stupid objections to the terrorists trial being held in NY, and also goes on to say this....

"What’s an actual insult to the victims of 9/11 is the idea that America is not strong enough to withstand the blatherings of a mass murderer. For me, the prospect of KSM grandstanding at his trial falls into I-wish-a-motherfucker-would territory. I want to hear how KSM builds a case against America, because everyone will hear how laughably conspiratorial and clownish it is. Think of what a cathartic moment it will be when America sees the face of the man considered to be UBL’s most efficient henchman and he delivers a pitiful harangue to a bank of cameras. No one will be emboldened to do anything but laugh. The only downside will be his inevitable discussion of how CIA operatives tortured him.

My hope for the KSM trial is that it does more than all this. It should forever shatter the pernicious myth that al-Qaeda is composed of supermen — supermen against whom America has no choice but to alter its character and most precious laws in order to confront.

Read the rest here:http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/11/14/whos-afraid-of-khalid-shaikh-mohammed/

So while reading the comments about this post I thought this one was excellent and says alot about our fraidy-cat rethugs:


sgwhiteinfla November 15th, 2009 at 10:54 am

I love this post and of course I’ll be linking to it, but I wanted to make one small correction. You see Sarah Palin isn’t REALLY afraid of what KSM will say or do during the trial. What she is REALLY afraid is that a Democratic administration will do what a Republican administration didn’t. And that is show that our system of justice is stronger than any terrorist in some far off land living in a cage. And also that we will NOT show cowardice by bending to their will by not giving them a fair trial and thus becoming the caricature that they try to make out of our country. And finally that a Democratic administration will show more deference to our founding fathers than Bush or Cheney would have ever dreamed.

You see once KSM and his cohorts are dragged in front of a jury and are handed down the death penalty, then they lose the super villan with super powers status that Bush, Cheney and just about every Republican in Congress has given them for the last 8 years. And guess what, if there are no more boogey men then Republicans will have a hard time finding someone to fearmonger against when they are pimping their national security cred.

As with most things that have to do with Republican criticism of moves that the Obama administration makes, this has almost nothing to do with what they are actually saying and everything to do with what they see as their political futures. See also, health care, cap and trade, gay marriage…etc

How true is that??! Rethugs and their never-ending fearmongering tactics, it's the only way they know how to steal power and win over the ignorant segment of our population. Sad really.

Here's another great comment which reminds me of Saddam hiding in his rat hole, peeking out as he was found. It's so pathetic how these monsters are held up to be Satan himself in their evilness but are pions in the end. We shall see how KSM responds during the trial, and that's something we need to see, we wouldn't if rethugs had their choice of a military tribunal. comment:

I think keeping the face and bent personality of KSM out of the public eye, allowing him out of the shadows only as a caricature, is essential political theater for the national security state. That’s because, as in personal and family counseling, the monster in the living room keeps growing when it stays in the shadows. When it has a name, a place a date, a hurt, a harm, a fix; when it’s removed from the realm of the head on pillow at night and sees the light of day, it’s often very much smaller. It’s manageable and it can sometimes be cured.

Keeping KSM and those like him out of a public courtroom is essential for Mr. Cheney’s view of the world to win. It’s essential to keep the public in awe and fear, to keep it obligingly paying taxes without questioning to what use they are put. It allows Cheney and his successors to continue to build the national security state with no questions asked, no policies reviewed, no limits applied.

My guess is that KSM is no more frightening than the CEO of a tobacco company or an energy company, or a drug kingpin. Seen in the light of day, none of them are as mighty as the law. Keep them in a secret world, positions reverse and we live in fear, not hope.


Saturday, November 14, 2009

A GOP catastrophy

I got this list from AlterNet, It's 15 AWFUL things rethugs would do if they had the chance. WE MUST NOT give them the chance if we want our country to survive!! Remember, friends don't let friends vote Republican!! If this GOP agenda were implemented it would be catastrophic!

by Dennis Rahkonen, The Smirking Chimp

Always the political instrument of moneyed elites, and a retrograde societal force, the GOP today is more negatively impactful than ever. Here's what an unfettered Republican Party would do "for" America:

1) Greatly reduce or entirely eliminate taxes on the rich, thereby forcing hard-pressed working families to painfully make up resulting revenue shortfalls.

2) Bust labor unions, cruelly preventing the collective bargaining that's the key reason why US workers ever won decent wages and benefits.

3) Stubbornly deny the existence of ominous climate change while blithely pumping more pollutants into the environment from lucrative, dirty industries and practices. Although reputable scientists say 350 carbon parts per atmospheric million is the safe limit for sustained life on Earth, Republicans dismiss the frightening fact that we're already at a carbon level of roughly 390 ppm.

4) Remove "restrictive" regulations on everything from investment banks and credit card companies to a broad array of "profit-eroding" consumer protections, leaving the American masses exposed to a host of resulting abuses and dangers.

5) Continue to criticize and insufficiently fund public education, advocating private schooling instead, thus entirely ignoring that progressive public systems are used in every country that has education outcomes superior to our own.

6) Outlaw abortion, under a fraudulently moral guise, compelling the US to bloodily join those benighted, backward nations where thousands of already-born, living, breathing, socially functioning females perish because of sexist denials of their basic reproductive rights.

7) Continue to recite a Pledge of Allegiance whose last six words are "with liberty and justice for all," while remaining numbly oblivious to the harsh hypocrisy of preventing our homosexual citizens from marrying.

8) Speak often and loftily of freedom, but engage in secret wiretapping, repression of domestic dissent, neo-McCarthyite witch hunts, Red-baiting name calling, and a panoply of Patriot Act transgressions against the Constitution of the United States...all under the misused rubric of "national security."

9) Show the rest of humankind nothing but bullying world-cop arrogance through endless US interventions and aggressions on foreign soil, resulting not just in countless lives extinguished in indefensible wars, and billions of badly-needed dollars flushed down the drain, but constant al Qaeda recruitment against hated Yankee interlopers.

10) Generally drive down the income levels of America's working-class majority, as a purported cost-saving corporate measure, without appreciating that a populace that's too poor to buy back what society produces is doomed to economic ruin. A living wage is the ultimate "stimulus," but try to find even one Republican who favors it!

11) Continue to lie about the alternative, affordable health care for all that some fifty world nations' people overwhelmingly support, thereby propagandistically leading Americans to think that having private insurance whose premiums are rising at rates three times higher than our pay -- and which routinely denies coverage when it's required most -- is somehow preferable

12) Unleash de facto ethnic cleansing against 12 million immigrant men, women, and children, making them contemporary equivalents of the Jewish scapegoats that Hitler blamed for hardships Germans experienced during a prior period of capitalist economic distress.

13) Shamefully try to lend credence to their avarice and social irresponsibility by revising the Bible to obscure passages that place human need before abject greed, attempting to turn it into a facilitating guide for modern peers of the temple moneychangers whose tables Jesus angrily knocked to the floor (and who undoubtedly wouldn't be mentioned in the amended version that one conservative group is actually, amazingly trying to put into circulation).

14) Give full vent to the intensely bigoted hatred that has crazed extremists dreaming of literally tearing Barack Obama to pieces and gassing all liberals...if only they could.

15) Place the livelihoods and lives of over 300 million Americans in the hands of incompetent ideological "purists" such as Sarah Palin.

While there are certainly Democrats who've yet to show spine in furtherance of vital change, let's be absolutely clear about the unmitigated disaster that would follow if Republicans, in their present ultra-rightist incarnation, ruled our country exactly as they wickedly wished.

Friday, November 13, 2009

despicable fearmongering neocons, please watch!!









I am outraged at the rightwingnutfucks who are so hysterically trying to claim President Obama wants the trial in NY so all the dirt on the SHRUB and his Dick can come out during the trial therefore causing a mistrial, or even worse, the terrorists will go free because liberals are too fuckin NICE!!! Rethugs want these trials secret, they don't want the families to see the murderers found guilty?? They want a military tribunal. Well sorry fuckers, the world will see this trial, they will see we will find these terrorists guilty and they will face punishment. After 8 years waiting for these terrorists to finally have their day in court, it's President Obama who is doing it! So go ahead you nutfucks, FEAR, FEAR, FEAR!!!!!

RUSH hearts SARAH


This is too friggin funny!! Palin is putting herself out there again and some are saying she could win the nomination for 2012, Are they for real??? We finally have a president with some brains and class and the right goes bonkers! I have to believe we have evolved or I will not survive...

The Shrub speaks, or at least tries to...



Keith sarcasticly says 'don't laugh' at pieces of the Bush video, but I did and you will too. Also you will probably be sickened by his words and his smirkiness. Afterall this Shrub is responsible in part for 2 wars, thousands of American deaths, hundreds of thousands of Iraqi deaths, and an economy that almost (and still could) spiraled us to Hell. Listen carefully to what Bush says about free markets and what Keith and Alter respond with. Also Alter talks about 8 failed years in Afghanistan and the weight on Obamas shoulders because of it. President Obama is being thorough and thoughtful on a strategy to get us out of the quagmire, I trust he will do the right thing. As for the Shrub, how he can stand in the publics view and laugh and joke, PLUS put down this current president and his administrations monumental tasks at hand, is just the most sickening display of idiocrisy I have ever seen. May you rot in Hell Mr. Bush.

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Homeless veterans and O'Reillys stupidity


Republicans either don't give a damn or they are just brainless boobs. We all know the story of our homeless veterans. Mr. O'Reilly all you have to do is Google 'homeless veterans' and thousands of sites will come up. Maybe you can apologize and then do a program on how you can help out a homeless vet in your area!


Who are homeless veterans?

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) says the nation's homeless veterans are mostly males (four percent are females). The vast majority are single, most come from poor, disadvantaged communities, 45 percent suffer from mental illness, and half have substance abuse problems. America’s homeless veterans have served in World War II, Korean War, Cold War, Vietnam War, Grenada, Panama, Lebanon, Operation Enduring Freedom (Afghanistan), Operation Iraqi Freedom, or the military’s anti-drug cultivation efforts in South America. 47 percent of homeless veterans served during the Vietnam Era. More than 67 percent served our country for at least three years and 33 percent were stationed in a war zone.

How many homeless veterans are there?

Although accurate numbers are impossible to come by -- no one keeps national records on homeless veterans -- the VA estimates that 131,000 veterans are homeless on any given night. And approximately twice that many experience homelessness over the course of a year. Conservatively, one out of every three homeless men who is sleeping in a doorway, alley or box in our cities and rural communities has put on a uniform and served this country. According to the National Survey of Homeless Assistance Providers and Clients (U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness and the Urban Institute, 1999), veterans account for 23 percent of all homeless people in America.

welcome to the greatest country on the face of the earth, USA!! we can send our men and women into harms way but we can't seem to take care of them when they are lucky enough to return home alive?? we need to do a BETTER JOB!

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Breaking News.....

Official: Obama rejects war options

A senior administration official says the president doesn't plan to accept any of the Afghanistan plans. Full story

Betsy, the true story

Betsy McCaughey, Liar

Everyone here knows the real Betsy except for a few of my visitors, so this is for them. Enjoy ladies!

Betsy McCaughey is a professional liar. She lies. The things she writes are untrue. They are not even "distortions." They are made-up. Everyone has known this for years and yet she was still allowed to derail the nation this year.

McCaughey's schtick, as described by James Fallows, is to pose as a disinterested, objective researcher who is just shocked and dismayed to find something insane and evil in a piece of legislation supported by a Democratic president.

And then she sits down to write a very serious and nonpartisan and concerned piece of analysis of this evil thing in the legislation that she made up. And then some respectable outlet publishes her serious analysis. And then, within minutes, partisan Republican columnists, talk radio hosts, politicians, and operatives are disseminating talking points taken directly from that serious piece of entirely made-up bullshit analysis.

Her first stab at derailing this year's health care debate came with a Bloomberg column about fictitious health care rationing hidden in the stimulus bill.

In a July 24 column for the New York Post, McCaughey smeared Ezekiel Emanuel (the nice Emanuel brother) as a murderous "deadly doctor."

In a radio interview with Fred Thompson, McCaughey got more explicit, wholly inventing mandatory death panel sessions American seniors would have to face every five years.

And, thus, "death panels." From Betsy to Rush to Sarah Palin to Chuck Grassley to your own old relatives forwarding you crazy shit, probably.

Of course, she's been at this forever. In 1994, McCaughey worked for the Manhattan Institute, a right-wing think tank. And then she wrote a piece for The New Republic about how the Clinton health care plan would not allow people to buy health care coverage outside the government-run plan. This, obviously, was false. George Will picked up on it, adding nonsense about jail terms.

(Andrew Sullivan edited The New Republic from 1991 through 1996. In 1994, Sullivan was on a roll, publishing both the objectively racist pseudoscience of The Bell Curve and Betsy McCaughey's No Exit. This was all before Ruth Shalit and Stephen Glass. Current editor Franklin Foer apologized for the McCaughey piece shortly after assuming his position. Sullivan never really has. McCaughey's story was really more the fault of owner/"editor-in-chief" Marty Peretz, of course, because he had a psychotic hatred of Bill Clinton.)

So. After that one lying story full of lies made her famous, Al D'Amato told George Pataki to make her Lietenant Governor of New York. She did not get along with Pataki, and she famously, weirdly, stood up for the entirety of Pataki's 1996 State of the State address. In 1997, Pataki dropped her from the ticket with a nasty public letter and she decided to become a Democrat in order to run against him. She ended up on the Liberal Party ticket, and lost, obviously, and then she moved to DC to work for the Hudson Institute, another right-wing think tank.

So she is a known liar and an elected Republican politician (her brief and bizarre stint as a vengeful Liberal party candidate aside), and here she is still forcing people to argue with chimerical fantasies instead of legitimate criticisms of progressive legislation.

We are hard pressed to come up with any equivalent figure on "the left," who openly and intentionally lies in the service of her partisan arguments, and who continues to do so with relative impunity, in major publications, long after the lies are exposed.

Would you call this statistic un-American?

Lack of health care killed 2,266 US veterans last year: study

WASHINGTON — The number of US veterans who died in 2008 because they lacked health insurance was 14 times higher than the US military death toll in Afghanistan that year, according to a new study.

The analysis produced by two Harvard medical researchers estimates that 2,266 US military veterans under the age of 65 died in 2008 because they lacked health coverage and had reduced access to medical care.

That figure is more than 14 times higher than the 155 US troop deaths in Afghanistan in 2008, the study says.

Released as the United States commemorates fallen soldiers on Veterans Day, the study warns that even health care provided by the Veterans Health Administration (VA) leaves many veterans without coverage.

The analysis uses census data to isolate the number of US veterans who lack both private health coverage and care offered by the VA.


A sobering reminder on a day we honor and remember our brave veterans. God Bless our Veterans!

Mormons VS. Gays

Salt Lake OKs gay rights laws with Mormon backing
11/11/2009 7:24:00 AM
Associated Press/AP Online
By Jennifer Dobner

SALT LAKE CITY - The Mormon church for the first time has announced its support of gay rights legislation, an endorsement that helped gain unanimous approval for Salt Lake city laws banning discrimination against gays in housing and employment.

The Utah-based church's support ahead of Tuesday night's vote came despite its steadfast opposition to gay marriage, reflected in the high-profile role it played last year in California's Proposition 8 ballot measure that barred such unions.

"The church supports these ordinances because they are fair and reasonable and do not do violence to the institution of marriage," Michael Otterson, the director of public affairs for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints said.

Passage made Salt Lake City the first Utah community to prohibit bias based on sexual orientation or gender identity. Under the two new ordinances, it is illegal to fire someone from their job or evict someone from their residence because they are lesbian, bisexual, gay or transgender.

Utah lawmakers tend to quickly fall in line when the influential church makes a rare foray into legislative politics. So Tuesday's action could have broad reaching effects in this highly conservative state where more than 80 percent of lawmakers and the governor are church members.

"What happened here tonight I do believe is a historic event," said Brandie Balken, director of the gay rights advocacy group Equality Utah. "I think it establishes that we can stand together on common ground that we don't have to agree on everything, but there are lot of things that we can work on and be allies."

But the church has pointed out an inherent dispute it has with the gay lifestyle. Mormonism considers traditional marriages central to God's plan. Gays are welcome in church, but must remain celibate to retain church callings and full membership.

It's strong support for Proposition 8 in California last year drew a sharp reaction from gay rights supporters nationwide, with many protesting outside temples that singled out Mormons as the key culprits in restricting the rights of gay couples.

Since then, however, Utah's gay community has sought to engage church leaders in quiet conversations to help foster better understanding, said Valerie Larabee, executive director of the Utah Pride Center.

"I thought this conversation would never come to be while I was here in Salt Lake City," said Larabee, adding that the discussions have "shifted her perspective of what's possible" and could foreshadow a different relationship between the two sides.

But addressing the council on Tuesday, Otterson said the endorsement is not a shift in the church's position on gay rights and stressed it "remains unequivocally committed to defending the bedrock foundation of marriage between a man and a woman."

Church support for the ordinances is due in part to the way the legislation was drafted to protect those rights. Exceptions in the legislation allow churches to maintain, without penalty, religious principles and religion-based codes of conduct or rules.

"In drafting these ordinances, the city has granted common-sense rights that should be available to everyone, while safeguarding the crucial rights of religious organizations," Otterson said Tuesday .

Previous Utah legislation that sought statewide protections for the gay community did not contain those exceptions.

And although this was the church's first public endorsement of specific legislation, it is not the first time the church has voiced support for some gay rights. In August 2008 the church issued a statement saying it supports gay rights related to hospitalization, medical care, employment, housing or probate as long as they "do not infringe on the integrity of the traditional family or the constitutional rights of churches."

Last year, church leaders were silent on a package of gay rights bills known as the Common Ground Initiative, dooming them from the start.


"Gays are welcome in church but must remain celibate to retain church callings and full membership."

I'm not sure why gays would even want to be a member of this church. I'm not an 'organized religion' type person (Mormon, Catholic), I do believe in God however. I'm not comfortable with churches telling people how they should live. For instance, a gay, or even a divorced person can't hold a position in a church, such as a youthgroup leader etc. etc.

In 2008 the church says it supports gay rights relating to hospitalization, medical care, employment, housing and probate [as long as they keep far, far away from the traditional Mormon family who has high moral standings and gays have NO moral standings and are an abomination in the eyes of God and all god-fearing Mormons.] (sarcasm injected)

Church leaders and church congregations are not free from sin and sinful lifestyles, but they have the right to tell others how to live and whether they can be a church member? Are Mormon churches taking memberships of just sinless straight folks? Yes, I'm ignorant, I know nothing about Mormon restrictions on citizens, but what this article says to me is Mormons view themselves as superior in the eyes of God. I thought the doors of churches were open to all who wanted to enter and worship. BUT, in Utah, if you are gay, and don't wish to obey the demand to be celibate, you better find a more friendly church with open doors and an open heart.

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

the good, the bad, and the ugly



This video says alot, but you won't learn anything if you don't listen to it! I have had conservatives say to me they WILL NOT listen to any MSNBC shows. Well then don't, but don't come here and spew fearmongering lies if you don't get both sides of the story.

The bill is not complete, but one of the major issues is whether a bill will stop rising premiums. We won't be able to afford these costs in the next 5 years!

Why do you, and a handful of conservatives think you have the answers? Why do you think we need to listen to you? You don't listen to the president and the democrats who have worked their butts off to help our country! Just because you fear this change, just because you fear ANYTHING but the status quo, doesn't mean you are RIGHT!

Monday, November 9, 2009

I hope you don't choose jail over insurance!

The HC bill passed in the House, as we all know by now. That's a good thing as Martha would say!

I keep getting this comment from my resident troll lisa. She would like to know how we feel about large fines levied on us, or even jail time if we don't buy health insurance.

First off lisa, we have a long fight ahead of us before President Obama signs the bill. Second, we don't know what the final bill will say about fines and jail time. But I would like to say this, if a person like yourself does not have insurance and something catastrophic happens to you and you need to be hospitalized, then who will pay your bills? What happens today is the hospital will not turn you away but we the taxpayers would have to pay your bills. Does that not make sense for all Americans to carry insurance? With the new bill insurance will be affordable so we all can be covered and can take responsibility for ourselves, not every Tom, Dick and Harry. Isn't that what Repubs want? NOT to have to take care of anyone but themselves? Isn't it unfair for you to get sick and your hospital bills are in the hundreds of thousands and we have to pay them?

It's a new America lisa, take responsibilty for yourself, buy your new affordable insurance policy then you can get as sick as you want and it won't bother us at all because you'll be COVERED!! YAY!

Sunday, November 8, 2009

YAY!!

I'm behind and outta the loop cuz I went on a weekend shopping spree in Lancaster, PA. BUT, the lousy hotel TV did let me see the healthcare bill passage even if it was on FOX!! Yay House dems and one lonely repub, way to work it out!!

Friday, November 6, 2009

Is your job going to a Bosnian??

The nation's unemployment rate soared in October to 10.2 percent, the highest rate since 1983, the government announced Friday.
The nation's employers shed 190,000 jobs from their payrolls over the last month, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said this morning, bringing the total number of jobs lost since the recession started to 7.3 million.

Now I know the government has had a hand in bringing disadvantaged people into our country for years, but something has happened to one of my family members this year and I'm seeing something first hand I didn't have a clue about.

My neice works for a major bank, one of the "big banks" in Delaware. When another "big bank" took over this bank there was major restructuring. My neice, who was employed there for over 10 years and was a department manager making a good wage, was told her department was being eliminated. So, she has found herself in the job searching market like hundreds of thousands of Americans.

Last week she told me she was going to New York to train people who have been hired to do her job that has moved to New York! This major bank has eliminated jobs in Delaware and moved that part of the bank to New York, do you know why?? I just got the story, and there are missing pieces because the neice was leary of me talking about it in blogland, but I'm pissed so here's what I know...

The government is bringing people from Bosnia to America, this bank has hired these people for one third the cost of employing educated and experienced American workers!! SO.... the American worker stands in the unemployment line while the Bosnian has her job, It's not just Bosnia of course, it is all over the world. Do you live in an area where all gas stations and dollar stores are owned by foreignors?? I do!! Does anyone talk about this?? Well maybe the time is now, when Americans are losing their jobs and can't find employment!

So when you read about employers shedding thousands of jobs, Are they doing it to rehire the cheaper worker?

From USA TODAY:


AP Investigation: Banks sought foreign workers





SANTA CLARA, Calif. — Major U.S. banks sought government permission to bring thousands of foreign workers into the country for high-paying jobs even as the system was melting down last year and Americans were getting laid off, according to an Associated Press review of visa applications.

The dozen banks now receiving the biggest rescue packages, totaling more than $150 billion, requested visas for more than 21,800 foreign workers over the past six years for positions that included senior vice presidents, corporate lawyers, junior investment analysts and human resources specialists. The average annual salary for those jobs was $90,721, nearly twice the median income for all American households.

As the economic collapse worsened last year -- with huge numbers of bank employees laid off -- the numbers of visas sought by the dozen banks in AP's analysis increased by nearly one-third, from 3,258 in the 2007 budget year to 4,163 in fiscal 2008.

The AP reviewed visa applications the banks filed with the Labor Department under the H-1B visa program, which allows temporary employment of foreign workers in specialized-skill and advanced-degree positions. Such visas are most often associated with high-tech workers.

It is unclear how many foreign workers the banks actually hired; the government does not release those details. The actual number is likely a fraction of the 21,800 foreign workers the banks sought to hire because the government only grants 85,000 such visas each year among all U.S. employers.

During the last three months of 2008, the largest banks that received taxpayer loans announced more than 100,000 layoffs. The number of foreign workers included among those laid off is unknown.

Foreigners are attractive hires because companies have found ways to pay them less than American workers.

Companies are required to pay foreign workers a prevailing wage based on the job's description. But they can use the lower end of government wage scales even for highly skilled workers; hire younger foreigners with lower salary demands; and hire foreigners with higher levels of education or advanced degrees for jobs for which similarly educated American workers would be considered overqualified.

"The system provides you perfectly legal mechanisms to underpay the workers," said John Miano of Summit, N.J., a lawyer who has analyzed the wage data and started the Programmers Guild, an advocacy group that opposes the H-1B system.

David Huber of Chicago is a computer networking engineer who has testified to Congress about losing out on a 2002 job with the former Bank One Corp. He learned later the bank applied to hire dozens of foreign visa holders for work he said he was qualified to do.

"American citizenship is being undermined working in our own country," Huber said in an AP interview.

Beyond seeking approval for visas from the government, banks that accepted federal bailout money also enlisted uncounted foreign workers, often in technology jobs, through intermediary companies known as "body shops." Such businesses are the top recipients of the H-1B visas.

The use of visa workers by ailing banks angers Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the senior Republican on the Senate Finance Committee.

"In this time of very, very high unemployment ... and considering the help these banks are getting from the taxpayers, they're playing the American taxpayer for a sucker," Grassley said in a telephone interview with AP.

Grassley, with Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., is pushing for legislation to make employers recruit American workers first, along with other changes to the visa program.

Banks turned to foreign workers before the current economic crisis, said Diane Casey-Landry, chief operating officer for the American Bankers Association. The group said a year ago that demand exceeded the pool of qualified workers in areas like sales, lending and bank administration. Now with massive layoffs, the situation is different, Casey-Landry said.

The issue takes on a higher profile as the government injects billions of dollars into the economy and President Barack Obama pushes for massive government spending to create jobs nationwide, on top of the $700 billion already approved for the ailing banks.

"You're using taxpayer dollars and there's an expectation that there are benefits to the U.S.," said Ron Hira, a national expert on foreign employment and assistant public policy professor at the Rochester Institute of Technology. "What you're really doing is leaking away those jobs and benefits that should accrue to the taxpayers."

But New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg believes more access to "worldwide talent pools" will better position U.S. financial companies against global competitors, spokesman Andrew Brent said.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services declined to disclose details on foreign workers hired at the banks that have received federal bailouts. The AP has requested the information under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act.

Nearly all the banks the AP contacted also declined to comment on their foreign hiring practices. Arlene C. Roberts, spokeswoman for State Street Corp. of Boston, which has received $2 billion in bailout money, said the company has reduced H-1B hiring in recent years, and just hires for specialized positions.

Jennifer Scott of Yreka, Calif., a retired technical systems manager at Bank of America in Concord, Calif., said in 2004 she oversaw foreign employees from a contractor firm that also sent overnight work to employees in India.

"It had nothing to do with a shortage, but they didn't want to pay the U.S. rate," she said, adding that the quality of the work was weak. "It's all about numbers crunching."









Thursday, November 5, 2009

Boner doesn't know dick about my freedoms!!



Loss of freedoms Boner??? Have you ever had to get approval from your insurance co. for a much needed operation? Have you ever had to argue with your insurance co. because you wanted to go to the lab in your neighborhood instead of the one 20 miles away? Have you ever had to choose a new DR. and leave the one you had and trusted for 10 years because he wasn't in the "network"?? I'm sorry but you are mistaken when you stupidly talk about freedoms! In August teabaggers showed up at town halls and it didn't amount to a pile of shit for your wingnuttery stance on HC reform. On 9/12 the wingnutfucks who showed up at Beckwads rally didn't amount to "hundreds of thousands". Thats a fact. Today your little rally will not get you anywhere, so please, PLEASE shut up. You and your rethugs are WRONG and the people of this country are NOT listening to you!!

Molly Ivins

Willis left me a comment on my 'conservatives vs. GOP' post and mentioned Molly Ivins. Now you all know I am not a writer and could not recall ever hearing the name, so I googled Ms. Molly and started reading about this remarkable woman. I will continue my read but wanted to post this quote because, well, I just loved it!

"So keep fightin' for freedom and justice, beloveds, but don't you forget to have fun doin' it. Lord, let your laughter ring forth. Be outrageous, ridicule the fraidy-cats, rejoice in all the oddities that freedom can produce. And when you get through kickin' ass and celebratin' the sheer joy of a good fight, be sure to tell those who come after how much fun it was."—quoted by John Nichols for The Nation Original source: "The Fun's in the Fight" column for Mother Jones, 1993.


She is also credited with applying the nickname SHRUB to George W. Bush.
And I thought Reality Zone was responsible for that nickname to Bush! lol

Conservatives VS. GOP moderates??




Have you seen this? Dick Armey and his army of teabagging conservatives are planning to continue what they did in the NY-23 race, led by Sarah Palin, even though what they did was get a democrat elected!! This video was made before the dem victory in NY, can Armey still believe in what he is planning, to oust moderate repubs and replace them with rightwingfucknuts?? I'm thinking this is suicide for republicans. Is this guy for real??

What do I think?? Armey is fuckin wacko!!

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

extended benefits, finally...

Finally, GOP Joins the Dems to extend Unemployment Benefits!

from Firedoglake:

Moments ago, the Senate gave final passage on a bill that would extend unemployment benefits in all states for an additional 14 weeks, with 6 weeks on top of that for the most hard-hit states. The vote was 98-0. Earlier today cloture was passed on the bill by a whopping 97-1 count (only Jim DeMint voted no), but a final vote was expected on Thursday. A deal was reached to speed up that process a bit.

However, this does not exonerate Republicans for spending weeks holding up the bill, trying to attach unrelated amendments and denying unanimous consent to bring the bill to the floor. In that time, hundreds of thousands of Americans saw their unemployment benefits run out, and found themselves with no sustaining income.

The final bill added $20 billion in business tax breaks and an inefficient and poorly targeted homebuyer tax credit to the bill, to partner with an unemployment extension that cost only $2 billion. The entire bill is paid for (but that revenue could have been put to use on better things than business tax breaks and the homebuyer credit). The unemployment benefits, at least, will offer a small economic stimulus to the country.

This odyssey over getting the unemployed a benefits extension is an ominous warning for anyone who thinks that health care will pass smoothly once it hits the Senate floor.

You're damn right the rethugs should pay for their obvious obstruction and delay of this bill! Isn't it clear to you the rethugs in Congress don't give 2 shits about whether or not you get your bills paid on time or you have food on your table! If they cared they would NOT have delayed this vote! AND as for Harry Reid, come on Harry, you have got to do a better job! Progressives are losing patience with panty wipe Dems! Come on Mr. President, are you listening!

NJ has a new Gov.

New Jersey Democrats, and Democrats in general, can rest assured last nights loss was not a referendom on President Obama but more a reflection on NJ's troubled economy and taxes, taxes, taxes. Would I have liked to see Corzine reelected, YES, but I will wish Christie luck and watch carefully to see if he can handle NJ's problems.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs today said that Republican gubernatorial victories in Virginia and New Jersey do not portend anything for President Obama, but the special election in Upstate New York has ramifications for the GOP. The Democrat Bill Owens' win is the important win!

In the New York race, Gibbs said, "we watched a party pick a candidate and then purge that candidate. And I think the result was an election (in which) that district sent its first non-Republican to Congress since before the Civil War."
Referring to tea party activists and other conservatives supporting Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman, Gibbs said the result of the race "proves that anger can get you 45% of the vote."

I'm glad I missed Michael Steele on Morning Joe gushing about the rethugs wins, but
he also seemed to deliver a bit of a rebuke to potential 2012 presidential aspirants in his party such as Sarah Palin, Tim Pawlenty, and Rick Santorum, all of whom immersed themselves in the NY-23 special House race with their endorsements and support for conservative Doug Hoffman who came up short last night.
"If you don't live in the district, you don't vote there, your opinion doesn't matter very much," Steele said while assessing the intra-party strife that resulted in a Democratic pick up of a seat held by Republicans since the Civil War.

GO SARAH,GO SARAH....

So, what's most important right now is Dems standing strong. Joe Biden is speaking out about the House seats in the 2010 elections. Republicans need to pick up 4o seats to take back control of the House.
Biden (who, BTW, did a great job in NY at a last minute rally while the pundits said he shoulda been in NJ helping Corzine!) said these House seats are Republicans “one shot” at breaking the Obama administration’s agenda, Democrats CAN NOT let that happen!

Monday, November 2, 2009

Economic recovery....




Please don't call me naive. I choose to listen to what our president says and give him the benefit of the doubt. I choose to look at the glass half full and trust him to tell us the truth. When Obama took office this country was crumbling, the steps he took will be argued for generations to come. Those naysayers who find it so hard to trust all I can say is LISTEN to what President Obamas' plans are, be realistic, these changes are not going to come easily or quickly. Democrats ALWAYS have to come into office and clean up economic disasters from Republican administrations. They have to restructure, rebuild from the ground up. The plans they have are long term sustainable plans. I like what President Obama says at this meeting. I trust him!

I found these comments from a person who viewed this video at ABCnews.com:

There is a clean energy jobs bill going to markup tomorrow-- a bill that would create 1.7 million jobs per $150 billion investment in the renewable energy sector, a sector we ought to be interested in leading globally. If clean-energy investments were to expand more quickly, overall job creation would increase correspondingly. (These job gains would be enough—on their own—to reduce the unemployment rate in today’s economy by about one full percentage point, and the figures account for possible jobs losses in conventional fossil fuel sectors of the U.S. economy as they would contract)

And what are the Republicans doing? Some are following Inhofe's lead and planning to boycott the markup.

Sigh.

Another comment from the same person:

I read a great column by Bruce Bartlett in Forbes on Friday. In it he provides a concise description of why government stimulus was necessary to battle this recession-- but the entire post is worth a read, even for those who are pretty far gone when it comes to economic ideology zealotry (Bartlett is a former Republican supply-side economist; now an independent)--

"The main differences between today's crisis and the Great Depression is that the deflationary pressure is less than a third of what it was in the 1930s and policymakers today reacted much more swiftly and more appropriately than they did after 1929. Those who think the government should have done nothing risked turning the current downturn into another Great Depression. Thankfully, their advice was ignored."