Social Security DOES NOT add to the deficit!!
I don't know why we have to keep talking about this, well yes I do, it's because the hardheaded, mean spirited, social program hating righties keep spewing lies about it!
Social Security, funded separately from rest of the federal budget,
quite simply pays benefits to those who have paid in. In order to
qualify to draw Social Security, an individual must work and contribute
to the program for 10 years. Social Security is not means tested;
benefits are paid progressively as a percentage of former earnings and
contributions.
The mean Social Security benefit is around $14,000 a year, providing
40 percent of retirement income for the average American. According
to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Social Security lifts 20
million Americans out of poverty. And, according to a recent
national survey commissioned by the AARP, 85 percent of adults oppose
cutting Social Security and half of non-retired adults support paying
higher payroll taxes to ensure the systems stays solvent. Younger
Americans, while skeptical about the program’s future, are particularly
supportive of the program. 90 percent of respondents aged 18 to 29 said
they believe Social Security is important.
However, while Social Security is popular, many Americans,
particularly young Americans, are skeptical about its future. Much of
this can be attributed to the misunderstandings and mistruths that are
continuously perpetrated by some in Congress and in the media. Here are
the truths behind some of the more common Social Security myths.
1. Social Security adds to the deficit.
Social Security, by law, cannot add to the deficit. It is a separate
program, paid into through FICA contributions, with benefits paid only
from the revenue it raises. If the trust fund were to be exhausted and
current contributions were not adequate to pay benefits, Social Security
could not borrow from the general budget. Federal law prohibits Social
Security from borrowing.
2. Social Security is broke, and there is no “Trust Fund.”
Conventional wisdom among Social Security skeptics is that the program
is out of money now and that there is no Social Security Trust Fund.
This is fueled largely by the fact that Social Security did begin to pay
more in benefits than it received in taxes earlier than was projected
due to the depth of the 2008 recession. Regardless of this fact, The
Social Security Trust Fund currently runs a $2.5 trillion surplus. The
Economic Policy Institute estimates the surplus will peak at $4.2
trillion in 2024.
Trust Fund intact, with no changes to the program, Social Security is
projected to be able to pay 100 percent of benefits until the year
2037. After 2037, Social Security will still be able to pay 75 percent
of benefits. A program projected to meet costs almost 3 decades into
the future with no adjustments is not a system in crisis. Other
government programs would be hard pressed to meet such a standard.
GOT IT??
Common Dreams.org...
Social programs did not cause the deficit
As Seth Freed Wessler notes for ColorLines,
deficit hawks’ emphasis on social programs is at odds with the factors
that actually created the deficit. The Bush tax cuts, the wars in Iraq
and Afghanistan and the bank bailouts are the big-ticket items when it
comes to government revenues and expenses. Yet deficit hawks in Congress
have been refusing to extend paltry unemployment benefits or food
stamps to the people hit hardest by the recession. And pretty soon
they’re going to go after Social Security too.
In reality, the deficit is only a problem if investors are afraid
that the government will default on its debt. Markets measure this worry
with interest rates—high rates mean investors are worried, low rates
mean they are not. Right now, interest rates on government bonds are at
their lowest in decades. With the recession dragging on and the recovery
weakening, now would be a great time for the government to spend more
money to create jobs and help those knocked out of work.
Instead, the policy debate features cranky old men whining about 310-million-titted cows.
The truth hurts the wingnuts, but if you really want some truth and a SS fix here's what NEEDS TO BE DONE. Make the rich pay their fair share!! SURPRISE! Right now high earners only pay SS taxes on the first 106,000 of their income! Can you believe that bullshit??! Make the rich pay their fair share, make them pay taxes on ALL their income and SS can be strengthened. All this talk from the deficit commission is crap when it comes to SS. Republicans HATE Social Security and every chance they get they will lie about it but the people aren't buying into their lies...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
The words "wingnut" and "truth" really should never appear in the same sentence at the same time.
Well done, again Sue!
Hugh it's so frustrating! Why is it we "little people" are so much smarter than those in Washington making these ridiculous decisions??!
Oh wait, they are smart but they think we are dumb enough to fall for their stupid lies and deceit.
There is a lot of money collected each year by Social Security. In 2008, Social Security took in 805 billion dollars.
The republican interest in Social Security has nothing to do with the deficit and everything to do with that 800+ billion dollars. Their benefactors in the Financial Industry are having a wet dream over the thoughts of getting their grubby little hands on it.
It is all about turning over billions of our dollars to Wall Street, and nothing to do with the deficit. They don't care about you or me or our financial future and our financial retirement. It is simply a way to funnel more money to Wall Street.
exactly right Jerry, exactly!
Added too they hate government checks going out to ordinary citizens. They don't want us getting a penny from the gov even tho it's OUR own money. Remember the other post I did about the banshee screaming conservative calling seniors grubby, greedy, disgusting low-lifes? Thats how they feel about their brothers and sisters....
Sure, they hate big government unless it's enriching them.
Cue the GOP internecine war on earmarks.
Nevada's disgraced Senator Ensign collecting government largess from health care reform he was against!
Lisa?
Mmmmmm....that had nothing to do with Sarah Palin. I will say that it was interesting (not so much that I will flip and join the Dark Side), but I wish I had seen the whole discussion.
Make no mistake, there is a division in the Dems ranks....but they wouldn't be Dems if there wasn't some chaos behind closed doors.
this post is not about Palin, lisa. Her picture is my header feature of the week, thats all.
Sue,
Lisa is use to pictures. The words give her trouble.
I agree with what Jerry said. As for us "little people" knowing that social security doesn't add to the deficit... some of us don't, as proven by the last election. The ignorance of some of the electorate is astounding.
Post a Comment